OPCO TOOLKIT

Welding methods
Pipe selection
Outside diameter (D)
508 mm
Wall thickness (T)
9.52 mm
Bevel parameters
2.4 mm
1.0 mm
75°
29,600 m
2%
Bevel cross-section (pass-by-pass)
T α F R
Pass breakdown
Per jointGMAW (root + hot) incl. waste + repair
0.38 kg
Per jointFCAW (fill + cap) incl. waste + repair
1.00 kg
Total Project (waste + repair)
Joints (12 m)2,797
GMAW1,170 kg
FCAW3,077 kg
Combined4,247 kg
Project totals (procurement, by method)
Total joints0
Combined consumables0 kg
NPS SCH / WT Length (m) Root method Fill method Joints Root mass Fill mass

Each row uses its own welding method combination. Bevel parameters (root opening, root face, bevel angle, repair allowance) are taken from the Single pipe size sub-tab.

NPS
(in)
OD
(mm)
Wall thickness (mm)

Reference: ASME B36.10M (carbon & low-alloy steel pipe). Wall thickness shown in millimetres. Empty cells indicate the schedule is not standard for that pipe size.

Stamp Name Process Position OD range Thickness range
Stamp Name Process Position Service
Stamp Name Processes Position OD range Thickness range
Bolt selection
Required torque
Torque
N·m
Tightening method
3-stage tightening (per procedure)
Stage 1 — 30%
Stage 2 — 60%
Stage 3 — 100%

Based on 70% bolt yield, outer-ring reinforced spiral wound gasket. For RTJ joints, repeat the 100% chase pass. For other gasket types, consult manufacturer.

Tightening sequence

Bolt count auto-fills per ASME B16.5 when you change flange size or class. You can override manually if needed.

Tighten in three passes (30% → 60% → 100%) following this diametrically-opposed sequence at every stage. After the 100% pass, do a final clockwise chase pass at 100% torque until uniform. RTJ joints require a second 100% chase pass.

Full reference table

100% torque values in N·m. Updates automatically when you change the lubricant above.

Total WDI
Completed WDI
RT/UT tested
Project repair rate
Welder leaderboard — sorted by repair rate
low-sample welders shown last
Welder Joints Dia/inch Tested Repair Repair % Last weld
≤ 5% excellent 5–10% normal 10–20% watch > 20% review
Daily output — last 60 days
Overall progress
Completed
Balance
Total scope
Progress by zone
Quick joint estimator
Joint volume
cm³
Joints / day
joints
Time per joint
hours
NPS
(in)
OD
(mm)
Seam
(m)
Joints per day (avg)

Each cell shows joints/day based on bevel cavity volume only (cap reinforcement excluded). Bevel parameters (root opening, root face, bevel angle) are taken from the Single pipe size tab. Joint volume = groove area × pipe circumference.

Quick joint estimator
Joint volume
cm³
Joints / day
joints
Time per joint
hours
NPS
(in)
OD
(mm)
Seam
(m)
Joints per day (Shop / Field)

Each cell shows joints/day for a Shop welder (top, blue) and a Field welder (bottom). Shop welders work in pre-fab areas with better access and lighting; field welders work in-situ with scaffold, position constraints (5G/6G), and tighter access. The model accounts for both welding time and fit-up overhead — fit-up is shorter in shop (controlled alignment) than in field. Joint time = welding time + fit-up time; productive shift is 360 min/day. Bevel parameters (root opening, root face, bevel angle) are taken from the Single pipe size sub-tab.

Welding parameters
Pass-by-pass heat input
Process Pass Voltage
(V)
Current
(A)
Travel speed
(mm/min)
HI gross
(kJ/mm)
HI net
(kJ/mm)
Status
Reverse calculation — find required travel speed
Required TS

Heat input formula: HI = (V × I × η × 60) / (TS × 1000), where η is the process arc efficiency per AWS D1.1 / EN 1011-1. HI gross uses η = 1.0 (raw arc energy); HI net applies the process-specific efficiency and is the value typically cited in WPS / PQR documents. Acceptance ranges are typical industry practice — always defer to the project specification.

Material grade preset Auto-fills typical mid-range composition
Joint & consumable parameters
Results
HAZ hardness (estimate)
Estimate based on cooling rate (preheat, HI, thickness); actual value must be verified by PQR macro test. NACE limit 250 HV for sour
PWHT recommendation
Based on thickness + alloy content
CEIIW
Carbon-equivalent (general carbon steel, AWS / IIW)
HAZ hardness sensitivity to preheat
Shows how HAZ hardness drops as preheat increases (heat input and thickness held at current values).
Chemical composition (% mass, from MTR)

Formulae   CEIIW = C + Mn/6 + (Cr+Mo+V)/5 + (Cu+Ni)/15.
Preheat is calculated per EN 1011-2 Method B, using CET, wall thickness, diffusible hydrogen and heat input. HAZ hardness uses the Yurioka empirical correlation (CE-based). Always cross-check against the project specification — values are advisory.